Posted tagged ‘says’

CBO Says Federal Deficit Hit Record $1.4 Trillion for Fiscal Year 2009

October 8, 2009

ABC News' Matthew Jaffe reports: The federal deficit reached a record $1.4 trillion in the 2009 fiscal year, according to an analysis released Wednesday by the Congressional Budget Office.

The report is not the actual deficit figure, which will be released later this month by the Treasury Department.

The year’s record-high deficit of $1.4 trillion equaled 9.9 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product, the CBO said. It is the highest shortfall relative to the size of the overall economy since 1945.

The record shortfall stems from an increase in spending to stop the recession, bailout the financial industry, and take over mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as a decline in tax revenues.

For the year, CBO said revenues dropped by $420 billion from 2008 receipts, a fall of 17 percent. The revenues totaled about 15 percent of GDP, the CBO found, the lowest level in more than half a century. Meanwhile, outlays were up $530 billion from a year earlier, an 18 percent increase, equal to nearly 25 percent of GDP, the highest level in more than half a century.

The previous record deficit of $459 billion was set last year by the Bush administration.

In August, the Obama administration projected the year-enddeficitto be $1.58 trillion. The CBO’s estimate is based on daily Treasury statements and CBO’s own projections.

Bill Clinton Says Right-Wing Conspiracy Now After President Obama

September 28, 2009

ABC News' Kristina Wong reports: Former President Bill Clinton says the right-wing conspiracy that attacked him during his presidency now is after President Obama.

When asked whether the “vast right-wing conspiracy” is still present today, the former president answered without hesitation, “Oh you bet.”

“It's not as strong as it was because America has changed demographically, but it's as virulent as it was,” Clinton said today on NBC's “Meet the Press.”

“Right-wing conspiracy” was the term used by former first lady Hillary Clinton to describe the tactics her husband's political enemies used to attack his presidency after revelations of his affair with Monica Lewinski.

“I mean they may be hurting President Obama,” Bill Clinton said of the current attacks. “They can take his numbers down, they can run his opposition up, but fundamentally he and his team have a positive agenda for America. Their agenda seems to be wanting him to fail, and that's not a good prescription for a good America.

“I mean, they're saying things about him just like when they accused me of murder and all this stuff they did, but it's not really good for the Republicans or the country, what's going on now,” Clinton said.

Repeat of 1994?

When asked to compare his administration's unsuccessful attempt at health care reform to President Obama's current push, Clinton said the president has been at a “terrible disadvantage in the law-making phase.”

“He has a better Congress than I did. And he doesn't have a committee chairman that I had demanding that he present a bill,” Clinton said. “So [Obama] said, 'OK, I'll let you develop the bill.' Well, while they're developing the bill, he's set out certain principles and he is vulnerable to whatever anybody wants to say about any of the bills moving through Congress — whether that's his position or not.”

But, Clinton said, the current situation will not lead to a “repeat of 1994”, when Democrats lost 15 seats in the House for the first time in 40 years, crippling progress on his administration's agenda.

“There's no way they can make it that bad, for several reasons,” Clinton said.

For one, he said, “The country is more diverse and interested in positive action.

“Number two,” he added, “they've seen this movie before, because they've had eight years under President Bush, when the Republicans finally had the whole government, and they know the results were bad.

“Number three, the Democrats haven't taken on the gun lobby like I did and they took 15 of our members out … so whatever happens, it will be manageable for the president,” Clinton said.

Hillary 2012?

Clinton said he was content with his current life in the non-governmentalsector.

“I love what I do now,” he said. “And while I can't touch as many lives and things as I did as president, the things I do focus on, we can have a huge impact on,” he said.

Asked whether his wife, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, would run for president again, he chuckled.

“That's up to her,” he said. “We're not getting any younger. But I'm proud of what she's doing now. I think she's doing a great job.

“I think it's pretty thrilling that she and the president just have established the relationship they have, and I think it's a good argument for reconciliation and remembering the good things for all the rest of us.”

Bill Clinton Says Right-Wing Conspiracy Now After President Obama

September 28, 2009

ABC News' Kristina Wong reports: Former President Bill Clinton says the right-wing conspiracy that attacked him during his presidency now is after President Obama.

When asked whether the “vast right-wing conspiracy” is still present today, the former president answered without hesitation, “Oh you bet.”

“It's not as strong as it was because America has changed demographically, but it's as virulent as it was,” Clinton said today on NBC's “Meet the Press.”

“Right-wing conspiracy” was the term used by former first lady Hillary Clinton to describe the tactics her husband's political enemies used to attack his presidency after revelations of his affair with Monica Lewinski.

“I mean they may be hurting President Obama,” Bill Clinton said of the current attacks. “They can take his numbers down, they can run his opposition up, but fundamentally he and his team have a positive agenda for America. Their agenda seems to be wanting him to fail, and that's not a good prescription for a good America.

“I mean, they're saying things about him just like when they accused me of murder and all this stuff they did, but it's not really good for the Republicans or the country, what's going on now,” Clinton said.

Repeat of 1994?

When asked to compare his administration's unsuccessful attempt at health care reform to President Obama's current push, Clinton said the president has been at a “terrible disadvantage in the law-making phase.”

“He has a better Congress than I did. And he doesn't have a committee chairman that I had demanding that he present a bill,” Clinton said. “So [Obama] said, 'OK, I'll let you develop the bill.' Well, while they're developing the bill, he's set out certain principles and he is vulnerable to whatever anybody wants to say about any of the bills moving through Congress — whether that's his position or not.”

But, Clinton said, the current situation will not lead to a “repeat of 1994”, when Democrats lost 15 seats in the House for the first time in 40 years, crippling progress on his administration's agenda.

“There's no way they can make it that bad, for several reasons,” Clinton said.

For one, he said, “The country is more diverse and interested in positive action.

“Number two,” he added, “they've seen this movie before, because they've had eight years under President Bush, when the Republicans finally had the whole government, and they know the results were bad.

“Number three, the Democrats haven't taken on the gun lobby like I did and they took 15 of our members out … so whatever happens, it will be manageable for the president,” Clinton said.

Hillary 2012?

Clinton said he was content with his current life in the non-governmentalsector.

“I love what I do now,” he said. “And while I can't touch as many lives and things as I did as president, the things I do focus on, we can have a huge impact on,” he said.

Asked whether his wife, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, would run for president again, he chuckled.

“That's up to her,” he said. “We're not getting any younger. But I'm proud of what she's doing now. I think she's doing a great job.

“I think it's pretty thrilling that she and the president just have established the relationship they have, and I think it's a good argument for reconciliation and remembering the good things for all the rest of us.”

“Shut Up! The Government Says” – McConnell on Humana Letter

September 24, 2009

ABC’s Z. Byron Wolf reports: Democrats announced yesterday that HHS was investigating whether the insurer Humana was misleading seniors about health reform legislation. And CMS, the government entity within HHS that administers Medicare told Humana, in no uncertain terms, to cease and desist lobbying its customers on health reform legislation.

But today Republicans accused the White House and CMS of trying to implement a “gag order” on insurance companies that provide Medicare Advantage programs.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell does not normally get riled up, but he just gave an impassioned speech on the Senate floor about the gag order, Humana, and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, who initiated the HHS investigation. McConnell referred to Baucus only as “a colleague.”

“Using the full weight of the federal government’s enforcement powers to stifle free speech should trouble all Americans — and all of us — even more,” McConnell said. “We cannot allow government officials to target individuals or companies because they do not like what they have to say.”

“Shut up! the government says,” said McConnell on the Senate floor of the CMS letter to Humana. “Don’t communicate with your customers. Be quiet and get in line,” he said facetiously.

There are two points to remember here. Humana is based in Kentucky, so McConnell is quick to protect them. And second, he is a staunch defender of the first amendment. For instance, McConnell is the often the only Republican to vote against a flag burning amendment when it periodically arises.

In a written statement, House Minority Leader John Boehner calls a letter of rebuke from CMS Humana “outrageous” and accuses the White House of “trying to keep seniors in the dark about the consequences of congressional Democrats’ costly government-run health care bills.”

“Would the Administration impose this sort of gag order if seniors were being given information promoting the Obama health care plan? I don’t think so,” says Boehner in the statement. “Seniors have a right to know about the cost and consequences of the Democrats’ health care bills, and Republicans will continue to tell the American people the facts about the nearly $500 billion in Medicare cuts that Democrats are proposing.”

CMS told Humana in its own letter yesterday, not to lobby its customers on the issue.

“CMS is concerned that, among other things, this information is misleading and confusing to beneficiaries, represents information to beneficiaries as official communications about the Medicare Advantage program, and is potentially contrary to federal regulations and guidance for the MA and Part D programs and other federal law, including HIPAA. As we continue our research into this issue, we are instructing you to end immediately all such mailings to beneficiaries and to remove any related materials directed to Medicare enrollees from your website,” according to a letter addressed from Teresa DeCaro, a CMS employee, to executives at Humana.

In its mailer to people enrolled in Humana Medicare Advantage programs, Humana said bills being considered in Washington include cuts to Medicare, Medicaid and Medicare Advantage programs.

Saving costs by making Medicare more efficient and cutting down on fraud in Medicaid are key sources of revenue Democrats envision paying for their health reform overhaul.

Humana admits in its letter that Medicare and Medicaid need to be run more efficiently, but adds, “if the proposed funding cut levels become law, millions of seniors and disabled individuals could lose many of the important benefits and services (emphasis theirs) that make Medicare Advantage valuable.

The insurer also entreats its members to join a “partner” program to get information from Humana about health reform and to contact their Congressman about how important Medicare Advantage is. It is that last part, lobbying, that most frustrated the Democrats.

UPDATE: There has been swift and vocal pushback to this Humana flap by Democrats. It has more to do with the assertion that healthcare bills will cut Medicare benefits than it does with the gag order.

“As indefensible as it is for insurance companies to send out propaganda for the sole purpose of scaring our nation’s seniors, those who have been paying attention shouldn’t be shocked,” said Jim Manley, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. “Insurers have spent millions of dollars to keep in place a system that is breaking the backs of American families with their skyrocketing costs and unfair practices. It’s clear that we are closer than ever to meaningful reform because defenders of the status quo are ginning up lies and scare tactics to stand in the way of fixing our broken system.”

And the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee pointed out that McConnell has taken a fair bit of campaign coin (more than $112,000 over his decades-long career).

“Mitch McConnell’s full-throated defense of one of the insurance giants seeking to kill health care reform may be unseemly, but it is certainly not surprising given all the Humana money lining his coffers,” said DSCC spokesman Eric Schultz.

Most to that point is what one Democratic staffer said.

“When my car insurer sends me a notice it is about my deductible not what congress is doing. Humana has plenty of outlets to express their view of potential legislation. They hire armies of lobbyists,” said the staffer. “Finally the information they were providing was misleading – there are ZERO changes to the benefits that Medicare participants are entitled to under the law in this bill.“

The distinction here is what constitutes a cut versus a cost saving. Health reform is financed largely by Medicare and Medicaid cost savings. The government will not cut any Medicaid benefits, but they will cut how much money they pay doctors and hospitals for services, etc, potentially affecting benefits in the future.

And Medicare Advantage plans are another separate issue. These privately administered Medicare-plus other benefits plans are an alternative to the fee-for-service that seniors on normal Medicare receive. They also cost the government about 14 percent more per person.

Grassley, Frustrated with WH, Says Baucus Bill Not Bipartisan

September 17, 2009

ABC’s Z. Byron Wolf reports:

Sen. Charles Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, said today that while Chairman Max Baucus' has bipartisan elements in it, it is not a bipartisan bill.

“This bill, except for five or six or seven or eight or nine or 10 — I don't know how many — things that weren't resolved has been put together with some Republican input. But to say that this is a bipartisan bill would be as intellectually dishonest as the Secretary of HHS saying on television recently that because Republicans had 86 amendments put on the HELP bill that it was a bipartisan bill.”

Grassley was clearly frustrated with the White House and Senate Democrats for wanting Baucus, D-Mont., to move forward with the bill without full buy-in from Republicans.

“We're kind of pre-empted from doing it right by being pushed or shoved aside by the leadership and by the White House because they want to move on,” Grassley said. “Particularly in light of the fact that so much of this bill doesn't go into effect until 2013. So what's another two or three weeks, if it could be done in another two or three weeks and end up with a bill that could have broad bipartisan support. “

And he said the White House caused strains in the negotiations this summer by saying Grassley, R-Iowa, was not negotiating in good faith.

“We've had 31 meetings of these group of six. We've had nine walk-throughs. I've had 156 meetings in my office dealing with health care, either with constituents or with other members. . . . And then to be accused of being political in the month of August when [I] didn't say anything different in Iowa than what I've been saying in Washington. That's not a very good environment to carry on a conversation,” he said.

Grassley danced around the fundraising letter his campaign sent to supporters in August that said he was working to defeat “Obamacare.” Today, Grassley said “Obamacare” was meant in that letter to represent the “public option.”

Several Democrats expressed optimism about the Baucus Bill.

Said Sen. Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark.: “It looked good.”

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., praised it as a measure that would bring “a lot of very positive transformation in the way we deliver health care.”

“Are there some pieces in it that I disagree with? Yes. And we're going to try to work on those,” Kerry said. “I think that people ought to feel positive about what's going on here. We're going to get a bill done, one way or the other. We will make changes in it.”

Kerry said one of his amendments would change the formula by which insurance companies are taxed for offering the high-cost insurance plans that many believe drive up the cost of care.

Many such plans are used by union members and Kerry said its important not ton pin health reform on “the workin' guy.”

Other amendments, he said, would tackle the affordability of insurance for the middle class.

Others said it needed more work. Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., said, “I think it needs more than just a few tweaks.”

“Top Line” — No Reward for Obama’s “Legislative Panic”: CEO of FreedomWorks says Congress should Start Over on Healthcare Reform.

August 15, 2009

ABC News’ Kim Berryman reports: President Obama’s hopes for a health care bill before the August recess are long gone and with the help of skeptics and concerned constituents, the administration’s sprint towards a bill this fall is now slowing to an uphill jog. This afternoon Matt Kibbe, president and CEO of FreedomWorks, a group “leading the fight for lower taxes, less government, and more freedom” said that hope for passing reform in 2009, is lost.

The White House used “an all or nothing strategy and I think they’re going to step out of this with nothing…I think enough Americans have raised opposition that the moderate democrats and the moderate republicans that they need to pass this reform are going to back away from this process and we’re going to start over and hopefully we do it right the second time” Kibbe predicted on ABC News’ “Top Line.”

As the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats push their political chips towards the center of the table on health care reform, it seems hard to imagine anyone settling for a do-over at this point in the game.

However, Kibbe insists that “passing a big reboot of the health care system is not something that the American public is eager to see right now.”

Instead of passing overall reform in a process of what he calls “legislative panic,” Kibbe suggests an incremental approach with bipartisan support and applauded the health insurance reforms put forth by Senator Jim Demint of South Carolina.

In the months of lobbying, committee meetings and White House phone calls, “the one group that [President Obama] cut out of the conversation was the public. They have an interest in this debate and they watched how the President passed the stimulus package and … the bank bailout last fall. They’re tired of these secretive, rushed legislative efforts,” Kibbe said.

The Obama administration has often voiced its desire to be more open with the public than the administrations that preceded it. Yet, with health care, the topic of transparency is a sore one. Just this summer, the Los AngelesTimes reported the White house’s reluctance to disclose a list of visitors coming by the famous mansion to discuss reform.

Obama himself is answering questions at town hall meetings in rapid succession this week. These meetings follow months of media coverage allowing him to explain the specific changes he had in mind. In ABC’s own Prescription for America special this June the president tried to make his plans clear to the American people. Despite these attempts, misunderstandings and disagreements among Americans have distracted the White House and congressional leaders from their selling points.

Just this week, Sen. ChuckGrassley, R-Iowa,a proponent of a bipartisan bill, addressed untruths about death panelsduring a town hall meeting.Meanwhile, the White House has launched a Reality Check website among other tools to address the more common concerns people have about health care.

“If you get an e-mail from somebody that says, for example, ‘Obamacare is creating a death panel,’ forward us the e-mail and we will answer the question that’s raised” President Obama said in a town hall meeting on Tuesday.

The hurdle health care will have to clear is the dread that many Americans like Kibbe associate with “the idea of government forcing anybody to buy insurance, particularly when they mandate what insurance that is.”

To see more of what Matt Kibbe told Top Line, click HERE.

Lizzie O’Leary, co-author of today’s eye-opening report from Bloomberg News,also stopped by the studio today to discuss her findings. The exclusive report by O’Leary and Jonathan D. Salant show that there are no fewer than six health care lobbyists for every member of the House and Senate.

To hear more about O’Leary’s report click HERE.

Palin Hasn’t Spoken to McCain in ‘Weeks’; Says ‘Department of Law’ Would Protect Her in White House

July 8, 2009

ABC News’ Kate Snow and Rick Klein report:

A few more tidbits from ABC News’ interview with Gov. Sarah Palin, R-Alaska, shed light on her thinking surrounding her decision to announce her resignation — and on her relationship with her former running mate.

Palin told Kate Snow that she didn’t give Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., a head’s up about her bombshell announcement to leave her seat early.

Asked about the last time she spoke with him, she responded only that she “left him a message a couple of weeks ago” when Exxon announced June 11 that it would work to build a natural gas pipeline in Alaska.

Asked about whether she touched base with him in advance of Friday’s resignation announcement, Palin responded:

“Didn’t tell him I was going to do this, but he is very astute, he is very sharp, he knew too that the distractions in the state — he knows me well enough to know that I am wired to not want to waste any time or any kind of resource. I want to get the job done.”

Asked if McCain would have had an inkling about her intentions, she responded, “don’t know if he could sense [that she was going to resign], but I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that he knows why I did it, and he knows how much I love Alaska. He and probably everybody else gets sick and tired of hearing how much I love Alaska.”

McCain didn’t put out a statement until the day after her Friday announcement. The statement read: “I have the greatest respect and affection for Sarah, Todd, and their family. I was deeply honored to have her as my running mate and believe she will continue to play an important leadership role in the Republican Party and our nation.”

Palin thanked McCain for his support in a Facebook posting over the weekend, and again in yesterday’s interview.

Snow also asked Palin whether, if she runs for president, she could avoid the “political blood sport” she cited as among the reasons she wanted to leave office.

“I don’t think it will be the day after day after day of ethics violation charges that are frivolous, that are ridiculous. I think on a national level your department of law there in the White House would look at this, the things we have been charged with, and automatically throw them out, not make somebody hire their own personal attorney to get out there and fight.”

There is no “department of law” at the White House, though Palin appears to have been referring to the White House counsel’s office.

–Kate Snow and Rick Klein

Saberi Says the National Anthem Sustained Her in Iranian Jail

May 25, 2009

ABC News’ Kirit Radia reports:

Roxana Saberi touched down on U.S. soil today after four months in a notorious Iranian prison.

The journalist told reporters upon arrival in Washington, D.C., that she sustained her spirits during her detention by signing the national anthem to herself. Incidentally, the lyrics to “The Star Spangled Banner” were written by Francis Scott Key as he was detained aboard a British ship in 1814.

“One thing that kept me going in prison was singing the national anthem to myself,” Saberi said. “And it may sound corny, but I’m so happy to be back home in the land of the free.”

As Saberi emerged from customs, she was greeted by loud cheers and applause from members of the crowd at Dulles International Airport on hand to welcome their own family members, but who were tipped off to Saberi’s arrival by the large number of television cameras on hand.

Saberi thanked President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the congressional delegation from her native North Dakota and the media for keeping her story alive. She also had thanks for the Iranian people who helped her parents through a difficult time.

Saberi, a U.S. citizen whose father emigrated from Iran, was a freelance journalist in Iran for the past six years. She was detained by Iranian authorities earlier this year, but the charges against her changed several times. She initially was charged with operating with expired press credentials, then for having purchased a bottle of wine against Iranian law. Finally, she was put on trial for espionage, allegedly for having obtained an Iranian government report about the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq.

The Obama administration vigorously denied she was a U.S. spy and urged that she be released on “humanitarian” grounds. Saberi herself went on a hunger strike to protest the charges.

She finally was released two weeks ago after an intervention by Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who is running for re-election next month.

GOP Leader Says National Security Won’t Drive 2010 Politics

May 24, 2009

Chalian ABC News’ David Chalian Reports:

Despite the stark divide on display in the Cheney vs. Obama battle today, the Republican charged with winning back a GOP majority in the United State Senate doesn’t believe national security will prove to be much of an Achilles heel for President Obama and the Democrats in the midterm elections next year.

“I think 2010 is likely to be about spending and borrowing and the anxiety the public have there as well as the failure to deal with other looming fiscal challenges like entitlement reform that threaten to swamp us,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) who chairs the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

Sen. Cornyn went so far as to say that he views much of President Obama’s national security policies in a positive light.

“I think the American people trust Republicans more than Democrats on national security, generally — that may fluctuate the polls,” said Cornyn. “People sort of view with some questions what the Democrats do on national security, but as long as the president is doing what he has been doing, which I view as — the preponderance of which I view as positive, then I think he’ll find the Republicans are with him and the American people will support him.”

The Texas Republican pointed to the Obama approaches in Iraq and Afghanistan and his decision to reverse course and refuse to release detainee abuse photos as encouraging signs, but continued to express concern about the president’s handling of the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay.

“His announcing the closure of GITMO without a plan to hold the detainees, I think got a pretty significant rebuke — bipartisan rebuke — in the vote we had in the Senate yesterday,” Cornyn said.

Later in the day, Sen. Cornyn ratcheted up his rhetoric in a statement critiquing President Obama’s speech today. “His attacks today on those with differing opinions on how to best keep our nation safe reeked of the very same fear mongering that he derided moments earlier. His persistent reminders that he ‘inherited’ these problems are unproductive and trite. Americans are looking for leadership, not finger pointing and excuses for the implementation of ill-advised policies,” said Cornyn.

As former Vice President Dick Cheney prepared to share the proverbial presidential stage today with his mano a mano national security showdown with Barack Obama, Sen. Cornyn said he doesn’t expect all of his candidates to embrace Mr. Cheney on the 2010 campaign trail.

“I think the vice president is controversial in some quarters, but there is nobody that knows better than he does about what the threats are that face our nation and why it was necessary to take extraordinary measures to protect our country,” said Cornyn.

At a reporters roundtable breakfast sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor, Sen. Cornyn was pressed on whether or not Mr. Cheney would prove to be an effective surrogate for the Republican candidates running for the US Senate this cycle.

“I think that depends on the race and where you are,” said Cornyn. “I’d be proud to appear with the vice president anywhere anytime. But I think it depends on the circumstance and the race,” he added.

Sen. Cornyn’s comments sparked Democrats around the country, who are eager to keep the politically unpopular Dick Cheney front and center, to ask Republican senate candidates in competitive states if they would be proud to appear with Vice President Cheney.

“Will you welcome Dick Cheney to Florida to campaign on your behalf?,” a Florida Democratic Party press release asks of Republican candidates Gov. Charlie Crist (R-FL) and Marco Rubio.
As for the substance of the Obama vs. Cheney national security debate, Sen. Cornyn doesn’t seem to believe the 2010 elections will be significantly impacted by President Obama’s national security policies, barring an outside 9/11 type of event.

Gates Says US Helping Mexico Fight Drug Cartels

March 2, 2009

ABC News’ Tahman Bradley reports:

Defense Secretary Robert Gates described drug cartel violence in Mexico as a “serious problem” and acknowledged that the United States is currently assisting the Mexican government in fighting cartels along the U.S. border.

Gates, in a Sunday interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press”, said the U.S. is providing Mexico with reconnaissance and surveillance capabilities, training and resources.

“I think we are beginning to be in a position to help the Mexicans move,” said Gates.

The war on drug cartels has cost 1000 lives in Mexico so far this year, according to reports. Cocaine and other drugs are smuggled into the U.S. from Mexico and attempts to fight the trafficking are hindered by corruption.

The secretary praised the Mexican president for getting tough with the drug cartels.

“President Calderon of Mexico, perhaps for the first time, has taken on the battle against these cartels. And because of corruption in the police and so on, he sent the federal army of Mexico into the fight. The cartel are retaliating.” he said.

On the subject of the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq, Gates said that the 30,000 to 50,000 troops that will remain in Iraq after 2010 will not face as great a risk as the combat forces there today.

“The way Gen. (Ray) Odierno plans this, the risk to our troops will be substantially less than certainly it was last year -and it has gradually declined,” he said. Odierno is the commanders of U.S. forces in Iraq.

Though some military commanders preferred that the U.S. combat mission in Iraq continue through 2010, Gates called it unlikely that President Obama might adjust the withdrawal timetable or send troops back into the country if the situation there worsens.

“I would characterize the likelihood of significant adjustments to this plan as fairly remote,” he said.

(more…)